I am Lecturer in Information Science, and Deputy Director for Postgraduate Teaching.
My research interests encompass issues around information law and ethics, including intellectual freedom, and freedom of expression, freedom of access to information, privacy, and the philosophy of information. I have also extensively researched around public library policy and development in the UK.
I am author of The Public Library (Facet, 2009) and was Editor of Library Review between 2006-2011 as well as co-author of Librarianship: an introduction (2008), and A Handbook of Ethical Practice (2007).
Prizes and awards
- Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts (FRSA)
more prizes and awards
BA (Hons) English Studies (Strathclyde)
MSc Information and Library Studies (Strathclyde)
MA Philosophy (Open University)
LLM Internet Law and Policy (Strathclyde)
PhD Computer and Information Sciences (Strathclyde)
MCLIP (Chartered Member of Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals)
FHEA (Fellow of the Higher Education Academy)
FRSA (Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts)
I teach several modules at both postgraduate and masters level:
CS 955 - Information Law
CS 211 - Professional Issues in Computing
CS 978 - Legal, Ethical, and Professional Issues for the Information Society
CS 800 - Health Information Governance
- Information law and policy, especially around issues regarding freedom of access to information and freedom of expression, and privacy.
- Information ethics
- Philosophy of information
- Public library policy and development
- Privacy and the library patron: an ongoing ethical challenge
- Privacy, surveillance and the information profession: challenges, qualifications, and dilemmas?
- The ethics of our profession and sustaining our common values
more professional activities
- Self-censorship and surveillance concerns of Scottish writers
- McMenemy, David (Principal Investigator) Smith, Lauren (Co-investigator) Williams, Nik (Co-investigator)
- In the human rights and free expression communities, it is a widely shared assumption that the explosive growth and proliferating uses of surveillance technologies must be harmful—to intellectual freedom, to creativity, and to social discourse. But how exactly do we know, and how can we demonstrate, that pervasive surveillance is harming freedom of expression and creative freedom? We know—historically, from writers and intellectuals in the Soviet Bloc, and contemporaneously from writers, thinkers, and artists in China, Iran, and elsewhere—that aggressive surveillance regimes limit discourse and distort the flow of information and ideas. But what about the new democratic surveillance states?
The question of the harms caused by widespread surveillance in democracies, is underexplored. In partnership with Scottish PEN, we are conducting a survey of Scottish writers to better understand the specific ways in which awareness of far-reaching surveillance programs influences writers’ thinking, research, and writing.
- 01-Jan-2016 - 01-Jan-2017
- Scottish ESRC Doctoral Training Centre DTG 2011 | Robinson, Elaine
- McMenemy, David (Principal Investigator) Robinson, Elaine (Research Co-investigator)
- 01-Jan-2014 - 01-Jan-2017
- PAUL: Policy-development for Acceptable Use in Libraries
- McMenemy, David (Principal Investigator)
- 02-Jan-2014 - 27-Jan-2015
- AHRC Capacity Building Scheme | Liddle, Calum Douglas
- McMenemy, David (Principal Investigator) Liddle, Calum Douglas (Research Co-investigator)
- Scotland finds itself so often in receipt of praise for having a stronger freedom of information regime. Media narration of high profile refusal notices south of the border, disclosures and, of course, any ensuing scandal which follows have been, perhaps, matters key to this all-too-common view. Are the overtures made to Scottish FOI otherwise justified? How the legislative differences play out on the ground is unknown: the consequences, if any, unheard. The Scottish provisions do, in actual fact, legislate for far stronger information rights for the applicant but there is, put plainly, a distinct paucity in any research which concerns comparative law and practice. The research offered a comparative study of the home nation FOI regimes; it afforded an investigation of the diverging trajectory in operational practicality. The analysis of the statutes was complemented by case law, qualitative inquiry, the application of FOI as a sui generis research method and a nod to contemporaneous events and official information which, in all the circumstances, looked to suggest that UK reverse-engineering is weakening the operational practicality of FOIA 2000 while FOISA 2002, to the contrary, maintains stronger information rights for the applicant in real-world practice.
PhD thesis will soon be available from the Andersonian Library, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
- 01-Jan-2012 - 01-Jan-2015
- Epsrc Doctoral Training Grant | Imperatore, Gennaro
- Dunlop, Mark (Principal Investigator) McMenemy, David (Co-investigator) Imperatore, Gennaro (Research Co-investigator)
- 01-Jan-2012 - 03-Jan-2016
- EPSRC DOCTORAL TRAINING GRANT | Mycock, Jane Victoria
- Buchanan, Steven (Principal Investigator) McMenemy, David (Co-investigator) Mycock, Jane Victoria (Research Co-investigator)
- 01-Jan-2012 - 02-Jan-2016
Computer and Information Sciences
View University of Strathclyde in a larger map