The UK REF2014 results are now available on the REF2014 website
There is further analysis of the University of Strathclyde results on the RKES portal but highlights include
- The overall increase of 14 places in the UK rankings by GPA is in the top five largest upward moves in the UK
- The Department of Physics has been rated the number one department in the UK – beating Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial College
- Strathclyde Business School is in the top 10 in the UK and number one in Scotland on GPA quality
- The Electronic and Electrical Engineering submssion was third in the UK and first in Scotland on GPA power ranking
- The combined Pharmacy, Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical Engineering and Speech and Language Therapy submisison to UoA 3 was fourth in the UK and first in Scotland on GPA power ranking
- The joint research including Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, Chemical and Process Engineering and Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering was rated fourth in the UK (GPA power)
- The joint University of Strathclyde and University of Glasgow Chemistry (WestChem) submission was fourth in UK
- Civil Engineering’s research was placed at eighth in the UK and first in Scotland on GPA quality
- Seven of our eight Engineering departments are ranked in the top 10 in the UK
- Government and Public Policy were ranked 11th in the UK and second in Scotland on GPA quality
- The University made significant progress in Social Work and Social Policy, rising 18 places in the UK GPA quality rankings
- History research has also delivered significant progress, rising 21 places in the UK GPA quality rankings
The Scottish Funding Council currently distributes the annual Research Excellence Grant on the basis of RAE2008 results, but will use the REF results from 2015 onwards.
A succession of research assessments since 1986 have determined the level of government funding for research in UK Higher Education through one element of the dual support system. An annual block grant supports research infrastructure and allows universities to undertake research of their choosing. This funding is allocated selectively on the basis of quality, the assessment process being carried out by the Higher Education Council for England (HEFCE) on behalf of funding bodies in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.
The other aspect of the dual support system is funding through Research Councils UK. The seven Research Councils receive money from the government's Science Budget, administered through the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, to provide support for specific projects and programmes. This funding is awarded on the basis of individual applications, which are peer reviewed.
The block funding for research from the Scottish Funding Council (Research Excellence Grant) is currently determined by a measure involving a weighting for Volume (number of staff submitted to RAE, number of research students, research assistants, and amount of research income) and Quality (based on RAE performance profiles for each UoA). From 2012 -13 the quality rating is even more highly skewed towards funding for 3* and 4* research, with no funding for research assessed in RAE2008 as 2* or 1* quality.
University research funding until 2015 will be determined to a large extent by the results of RAE2008. After that date it is intended that the results of REF will be used to inform government research funding.
- University of Strathclyde submission to REF2014 was made in November 2013
- During 2014 the REF Panels assess submissions, and produce quality profiles for each UoA
- HEFCE will audit all aspects of the submission in from January 2014 onwards. All HEFCE audit enquiries will be processed by the Strathclyde REF team
- UK REF results released on 18th December 2014 including the sub-profiles for outputs, impact and enviroment
- HEFCE will also publish comparative data on 18th December 2014. This will comprise, for each UOA, the average profiles for all submissions to the UOA (mean average, weighted for staff volume); and the minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and maximum percentage for each quality level from 4* to unclassified.
- The Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) will publish contextual data for the REF on 18th December 2014
- Subject panel overview reports will be published in Spring 2014
- In early 2015, HEFCE will publish the submissions on the REF website. For each submission they will publish: a separate list of staff and outputs; the submitted case studies and impact template; and the submitted environment data and template. They will remove personal and contractual details of staff, and any other data that the HEI has indicated should not be published for commercial sensitivity or other reasons
- During 2015 the funding bodies will also publish the impact case studies as a searchable database
The introduction of impact into the REF is an important addition to the assessment of research activity. This change is directly linked to policy statements by the former Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills in the document Higher Ambitions. In a letter to HEFCE in January 2009, the Secretary of State emphasised that the REF should take better account of the impact of research on the economy and society, and that:
'The REF should continue to incentivise research excellence, but also reflect the quality of researchers' contribution to public policy making and public engagement, and not create disincentives to researchers moving between academia and the private sector.'
Impact is defined by HEFCE as covering 'economic and social benefits that are built on research of the highest quality'. It does not include impact through intellectual influence on scientific knowledge and academia, or impact on students and teaching within the same Higher Education Institution. For REF, impacts occurring in the assessment period (1st Jan 2008 - 31st July 2013) must be linked to previous underpinning research or research-based activity, which has been supported by the institution claiming the impact. The underpinning research must also reach a threshold of quality defined as 'recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour.'
HEFCE published details of the types of impact and examples of evidence to support claims for impact in the Main Panel Criteria and Working Methods released in January 2012. For more detail on Impact at Strathclyde go to the Researchers' Portal
|maximum of 4 outputs per submitted person, with reduction for early career researchers and individual circumstances||two impact case studies for first 2 - 14.99 FTE submitted, plus one study per additional 10 submitted staff. UoA level statement||UoA level narrative on research environment, plus quantitative indicators on research degrees awarded and research income|
|assessed by expert review panels, with citation data provided to some sub panels||assessed by expert review panels which include end-users of research||assessed by expert review panels, informed by HESA data on research income and doctoral degrees awarded|
- HEFCE will publish the overall quality profiles on 18th December 2014 and this will include separate sub-profiles for outputs, impact and environment
- The Scottish Funding Council will use the percentage of three and four star research in the UoA profiles to calculate the Research Excellence Grant to Scottish Higher Education Institutions from 2015 onwards.
As a key measure to support equality and diversity in research careers, in all UOAs individuals may be returned with fewer than four outputs without penalty in the assessment, where their individual circumstances have significantly constrained their ability to produce four outputs or to work productively throughout the assessment period. This measure is intended to encourage institutions to submit all their eligible staff who have produced excellent research.