Dr Conor McBride

Reader

Computer and Information Sciences

Contact

Back to staff profile

Professional Activities

Scottish Programming Languages and Verification Summer School 2024
Organiser
29/7/2024
Contributed long talk TYPES 2022: TypOS: An “Operating System” for Typechecking Actors
Contributor
22/6/2022
NPL Data Science Seminar: "Typed functional programming: helping the compiler help you"
Speaker
13/7/2021
Contributed talk TYPES 2021: "Functorial Adapters"
Speaker
15/6/2021
Public engagement talk: "Dimensionally correct by construction: Type systems for programs respecting dimensions"
Speaker
15/6/2021
Contributed talk TYPES 2017: "Variations on inductive-recursive defnitions closed under composition"
Contributor
31/5/2017

More professional activities

Projects

KTP - Cambridge Quantum Computing (CQC) / R190328-202
McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Atkey, Bob (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)
24-Feb-2020 - 23-Feb-2022
KTP - Cambridge Quantum Computing (CQC)
McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Atkey, Bob (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)
24-Feb-2020 - 23-Feb-2022
Trusted Systems
Ghani, Neil (Principal Investigator) McBride, Conor (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)
01-Oct-2019 - 30-Sep-2024
Trusted Systems
Ghani, Neil (Co-investigator) McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)
01-Oct-2019 - 30-Sep-2023
Homotopy Type Theory: Programming and Verification
Ghani, Neil (Principal Investigator) McBride, Conor (Co-investigator)
"The cost of software failure is truly staggering. Well known
individual cases include the Mars Climate Orbiter failure
(£80 million), Ariane Rocket disaster (£350 million), Pentium
Chip Division failure (£300 million), and more recently the heartbleed
bug (est. £400 million). There are many, many more examples. Even worse,
failures such as one in the Patriot Missile System and another
in the Therac-25 radiation system have cost lives. More generally, a
2008 study by the US government estimated that faulty
software costs the US economy £100 billion
annually.

There are many successful approaches to software verification
(testing, model checking etc). One approach is to find mathematical
proofs that guarantees of software correctness. However, the
complexity of modern software means that hand-written mathematical
proofs can be untrustworthy and this has led to a growing desire for
computer-checked proofs of software correctness.
Programming languages and interactive proof systems like Coq, Agda,
NuPRL and Idris have been developed based on a formal system called
Martin Type Theory. In these systems, we can not only write
programs, but we can also express properties of programs using types,
and write programs to express proofs that our programs are correct.
In this way, both large mathematical theorems such as the Four Colour
Theorem, and large software systems such as the CompCert C compiler
have been formally verified. However, in such large projects, the
issue of scalability arises: how can we use these systems to build large
libraries of verified software in an effective way?

This is related to the problem of reusability and modularity: a
component in a software system should be replaceable by another which
behaves the same way even though it may be constructed in a completely
different way. That is, we need an extensional equality which is
computationally well behaved (that is, we want to run programs using
this equality). Finding such an ty is a fundamental and
difficult problem which has remained unresolved for over 40 years.

But now it looks like we might have a solution! Fields medallist
Vladimir Voevodsky has come up with a completely different take on the
problem by thinking of equalities as paths such as those which occur
in one of the most abstract branches of mathematics, namely homotopy
theory, leading to Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT). In HoTT, two objects
are completely interchangeable if they behave the same way. However,
most presentations of HoTT involve axioms which lack computational
justification and, as a result, we do not have programming languages
or verification systems based upon HoTT. The goal of our project is
to fix that, thereby develop the first of a new breed of HoTT-based
programming languages and verification systems, and develop case
studies which demonstrate the power of HoTT to programmers and
those interested in formal verification.

We are an ideal team to undertake this research because i) we have
unique skills and ideas ranging from the foundations of HoTT to the
implementation and deployment of programming language and verification
tools; and ii) the active collaboration of the most important figures
in the area (including Voevodsky) as well as industrial participation
to ensure that we keep in mind our ultimate goal -- usable programming
language and verification tools."
01-Apr-2015 - 30-Sep-2019
CORCON (FP7 IRSES)
Ghani, Neil (Principal Investigator) Kupke, Clemens (Co-investigator) McBride, Conor (Co-investigator)
01-Jan-2014 - 31-Dec-2017

More projects

Back to staff profile

Contact

Dr Conor McBride
Reader
Computer and Information Sciences

Email: conor.mcbride@strath.ac.uk
Tel: 548 3172